How to End Puppy Mills & Brokers – Starting with Tom Collins
Updated: Aug 30
“The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.” ― Albert Einstein
I feel as if I can legitimately call myself an animal advocate. I’m not vegan – I have dog hair in every meal. #ShepherdLife
But still, I will help an animal in need, and speak for those who have no voice. Right now the focus for me is puppy mills, and their slimy colleagues, puppy mill brokers and puppy mill flippers.
Puppy Mill Flipper (n): A person who knowingly goes into a puppy mill to purchase a puppy with the intent of flipping the puppy for profit. See also Tom Collins and Pick of the Litter.
So recently I (kinda) met The Man. Tom Collins. He showed up to the council meeting on October 1 to defend his actions. To bring you up to date, there have been many grievances filed against Tom Collins and Pick of the Litter, which were eventually brought to my attention. I wrote an open letter to Tom Collins, asking to hear Tom’s side of the tale (tail?) but I never heard back. So after doing some research, I held the first protest against his establishment at Southpark Mall in Strongsville, Ohio on January 2017 (to all 35 of you who stayed 2 hours outside protesting in 11 degree weather: thank you, and I’m so sorry!)
We’ve had subsequent protests where we have fried in the heat, frozen again, and then finally had nice weather, but let me ask this: who goes to these events, in this kind of weather, missing Game of Thrones, to protest a pet store?
Dedicated animal lovers do. It’s not fun for us. It kinda sucks. But we develop a solidarity. We know why we are here: for the animals. So we suck it up. Just as we did tonight (though I wizened up and moved the meeting to City Council…indoors!).
So we took it to Strongsville City Council. First, I would like to thank Council. It seemed to me that they took our grievances quite seriously. Strongsville Law Director, Neal M. Jamison addressed our concerns and made note that due to legislation HB60 (“Goddard’s Law”) passing back in 2016, City Council’s hands were tied with regard to regulating puppy mills and brokers, as governance had remanded to the state level. He also made note that Tom Collins & Pick of the Litter had been visited by Animal Welfare over 20 times in the last year, yet has found no violations. Well, things have changed since a year and a half ago.
HB 506 passed this year, governing the regulations for how the dogs are to be treated.
- Ceiling must be at least 6 inches higher than the dog’s head -Floor space should be length of dog, tip-to-tail, plus 9 inches, squared, x 2. We had Sheldon do the math for you.
For dog below, that would be roughly 15.12 sq. feet of floor space. Doesn’t look like he’s getting it.
Exercise: Daily exercise of at least 30 minutes, given opportunity for mental stimulation and socialization, and run at full stride during daylight hours.
I spoke with a former employee (Tom calls them “volunteers”) of Pick of the Litter, who, under condition of anonymity, stated:
“Tom didn’t like the dogs to run around. They were kept mostly in the cages at all times. He didn’t allow volunteers to take the dogs out to play.”
Finally, and most importantly under Ohio’s new animal welfare law, H.B.506:
-Prior to purchasing a dog, broker [Pick of the Litter/Tom Collins] MUST request breeder sign document stating compliance with standards of care established. If breeder doesn’t supply documentation, broker shall not purchase dog. Documentation available for inspection during store hours. Effective immediately.
There was absolutely no documentation available. No standards of care, no inspection availability, regardless of which employee was asked.
So let’s delve deeper.
Rescue vs. Pet Store
Tom Collins keeps stating that he “rescues” dogs. Let’s see what HB506 has to say about that (emphasis added):
“Animal rescue for dogs” means an individual or organization recognized by the director of agriculture that keeps, houses, and maintains dogs and that is dedicated to the welfare, health, safety, and protection of dogs, provided that the individual or organization does not operate for profit, does not sell dogs for a profit, does not breed dogs, does not sell dogs to a dog broker or pet store, and does not purchase more than nine dogs in any given calendar year unless the dogs are purchased from a dog warden appointed under Chapter 955. of the Revised Code, a humane society, or another animal rescue for dogs. “Animal rescue for dogs” includes an individual or organization that offers spayed or neutered dogs for adoption and charges reasonable adoption fees to cover the costs of the individual or organization, including, but not limited to, costs related to spaying or neutering dogs.
“Pet store” means an individual retail store to which both of the following apply: the store sells dogs to the public; and with regard to the sale of a dog from the store, the sales person, the buyer of a dog, and the dog for sale are physically present during the sales transaction so that the buyer may personally observe the dog and help ensure its health prior to taking custody.
Falsified medical records given by Pick of the Litter, as presented and taken into record during the Strongsville Council Meeting on October 1, 2018, show that the animals’ health conditions are not being observed and recorded, as required as a pet store.
Tom Collins claims he is not a dog broker:
“Dog broker” means a person who buys, sells, or offers to sell dogs at wholesale for resale to another or who sells or gives one or more dogs to a pet store annually.
If Tom is buying the dogs through various puppy mills (it’s okay, though, folks; he shops only at local puppy mills), that means Tom is the broker who is then selling as an entity, Pick of the Litter. Tom is the broker. Pick of the Litter is the pet store. So how does HB506 apply to brokers?
Sec. 956.03. (A)(9)(a) States that:
A requirement that an in-state retailer of a puppy or adult dog provide to the purchaser the complete name, address, and telephone number of all high volume breeders, dog retailers brokers, and private owners that kept, housed, or maintained the puppy or adult dog prior to its coming into the possession of the retailer or proof that the puppy or adult dog was acquired through an animal rescue for dogs, animal shelter for dogs, or humane society, or a valid health certificate from the state of origin pertaining to the puppy or adult dog;
I’m sorry, Tom. You have yet to identify from whom you’ve purchased your dogs (aside from identifying them simply as “in-state breeders”). You mean like these? Nine of the worst puppy mills in the country are located less than a 45 minute drive away from Tom’s house.
Section Sec. 956.041.
(B) A dog broker or the owner or operator of a pet store that seeks to purchase a dog from an in-state high volume breeder or out-of-state dog breeder, prior to completing the transaction, shall request the breeder to sign a document prescribed and provided by the director of agriculture. The document shall state that the in-state high volume breeder or out-of-state dog breeder is in compliance with the standards of care established in rules adopted under section 956.03 and in section 956.031 of the Revised Code. The broker or owner or operator shall keep and maintain the signed document. If the in- state high volume breeder or out-of-state dog breeder does not provide the signed document, the broker or owner or operator shall not purchase the dog. The broker or owner or operator shall allow the director to inspect the signed document during normal business hours. With respect to a pet store, the requirements established under this section are in addition to the requirements established under section 956.20 of the Revised Code. (C) No dog broker or owner or operator of a pet store shall knowingly sell a dog unless the broker or owner or operator has obtained a signed document with respect to the dog as required under division (B) of this section. The director shall not assess a civil penalty under section 956.13 of the Revised Code against a dog broker or the owner or operator of a pet store for a violation of this division if the broker or owner or operator has obtained such a document with regard to the dog.
Which is legal-speak for, “Where did you get your dogs from again, Tom?”
So how do we solve this little problem? A few ways.
1) Contact the Department of Agriculture. Like, now. Let them know that Pick of the Litter is non-compliant with regard to the information above. Demand inspection. Send letters, emails, carrier pigeons or even owls!
Whatever it takes:
Office of Chief Legal Counsel